Topic summary
19%3 analyzed articles/videos1,421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interfaith Relations results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 558 hits. Analysis detected 6,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,310 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (13,487 of 15,752 topics). This Interfaith Relations is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Interfaith Relations
Topic details
Total words: 9,310
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510014.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate