Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interest Rate Decisions results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 732 hits. Analysis detected 3,436 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,271 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,878 of 16,562 topics). This Interest Rate Decisions is worse (more manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
Interest Rate Decisions
Topic details
Total words: 2,271
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510088.7% percentile
8.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 28.2%28.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.3%19.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.2%32.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 32.2%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 28.2%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos