Topic summary
98%1 analyzed article/video783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Insurance Reform results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 748 hits. Analysis detected 3,654 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,349 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,784 of 16,562 topics). This Insurance Reform is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Insurance Reform
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,349
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 31.8%31.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 14.9%14.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.8%8.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 31.8%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos