Author summary
99% 1 analyzed article/video 783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr. Lourdes Asiain results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 748 hits . Analysis detected 3,654 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,349 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,037 of 6,316 authors). This Dr. Lourdes Asiain is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group. Dr. Lourdes Asiain
Author details
Total words: 2,349
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.6% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 31.8% 31.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 14.9% 14.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Author 31.8%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Author 14.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.5%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.2%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst