Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,067 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Insurance Premiums results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.2% saturation with 1,224 hits. Analysis detected 5,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,201 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,953 of 16,562 topics). This Insurance Premiums is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Insurance Premiums
Topic details
Total words: 3,201
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510088.2% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 35.4%35.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 38.2%38.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 14.8%14.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.4%19.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 38.2%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 35.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing Effect: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos