Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video658 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Institute For Science And International Security (isis) results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 3,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (5,990 of 16,562 topics). This Institute For Science And International Security (isis) is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Institute For Science And International Security (isis)
Topic details
Total words: 2,632
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.8% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.0%13.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.8%5.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos