Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Insects In Food results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Burden of Proof, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 375 hits. Analysis detected 2,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,665 of 16,562 topics). This Insects In Food is worse (more manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Insects In Food
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,844
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.8% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.3%20.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos