Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inmate Misconduct results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Anchoring Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 431 hits . Analysis detected 1,967 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,586 of 16,562 topics). This Inmate Misconduct is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group. Inmate Misconduct
Topic details
Total words: 1,984
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.3% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.9%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst