Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Initial Public Offering (ipo) results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 477 hits. Analysis detected 3,961 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Initial Public Offering (ipo) is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Initial Public Offering (ipo)
Topic details
Total words: 5,044
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos