Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Initial Public Offering results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 901 hits. Analysis detected 8,871 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,308 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,440 of 16,562 topics). This Initial Public Offering is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Initial Public Offering
Topic details
Total words: 9,308
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos