Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Inglewood results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 376 hits. Analysis detected 3,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,020 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Inglewood is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Inglewood
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,020
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos