Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Infrastructure Attacks results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 733 hits. Analysis detected 5,086 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,419 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,772 topics). This Infrastructure Attacks is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Infrastructure Attacks
Topic details
Total words: 5,419
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.7%12.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos