Topic summary
73% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,266 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Information Control results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,267 hits . Analysis detected 9,830 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,798 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (9,103 of 15,755 topics). This Information Control is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Information Control
Topic details
Total words: 9,798
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst