Topic summary
⁠93%4 analyzed articles/videos1,089 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Influencers results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 751 hits. Analysis detected 3,775 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,381 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,637 of 16,345 topics). This Influencers is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Influencers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,381
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.2%22.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.8%13.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos