BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 65.8% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 277 faulty-reasoning hits from 114 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 86.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,828 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 91.70% of the article peer group.

L.A. 
Influential is the story of Los Angeles in 2024 
L.A. 
Influential presents people of all ages, backgrounds and fields, who are making a difference in a city that is in constant flux. 
The Creators: A Hollywood trailblazer, a gaming visionary, a horror genius... 
The Connectors: A story huntress, a new kind of cop, a food tastemaker... 
The Money: A Magic billionaire, Hollywood’s political bundler, agricultural barons... 
The Civic Center: A groundbreaking mayor, a housing advocate, a giver of food... 
The Disruptors: The Mattel miracle maker, the modern Babe Ruth, the street vendor avenger... 
The Establishment: Mother of Kardashians, the nation’s vice president, a live music overlord... 
Watch: L.A. 
Influential Up Close 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic9.6%This article: 12.3%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic12.3%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 17.5%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect17.5%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 19.3%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias19.3%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 20.2%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias20.2%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 42.1%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect42.1%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.3%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization19.3%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 23.7%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)23.7%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 65.8%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice65.8%This article: 8.8%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination8.8%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S
4.4%

114 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading

Loading

Loading

Loading

Loading

Loading


Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.