Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Influencer Arrest results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 1,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 882 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,266 topics). This Influencer Arrest is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Influencer Arrest
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Influencer Arrest (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 882
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles882 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 19.9%19.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.6%17.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.7%6.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 6.2%6.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.2%14.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos