Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inflationary Pressures results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 1,071 hits. Analysis detected 7,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,223 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,342 of 16,562 topics). This Inflationary Pressures is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Inflationary Pressures
Topic details
Total words: 5,223
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.5%20.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.0%11.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.8%12.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.0%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos