Topic summary
⁠46%2 analyzed articles/videos1,197 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inflation Impact results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,323 hits. Analysis detected 6,873 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,827 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (13,023 of 16,562 topics). This Inflation Impact is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Inflation Impact
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,827
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.0%15.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos