Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gary Occhiogrosso results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 1,127 hits . Analysis detected 3,956 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Gary Occhiogrosso is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Gary Occhiogrosso
Author details
Total words: 5,236
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 21.5% 21.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 21.5%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.9%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst