Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Infanticide results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 244 hits. Analysis detected 732 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,962 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Infanticide is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Infanticide
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,962
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos