Topic summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video1,518 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Industry Trends results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 319 hits. Analysis detected 3,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,554 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,149 of 16,562 topics). This Industry Trends is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Industry Trends
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,554
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos