Topic summary
â 51% 1 analyzed article/video 837 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Industry Competition results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 479 hits . Analysis detected 2,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of â 46% (8,966 of 16,562 topics). This Industry Competition is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group. Industry Competition
Topic details
Total words: 3,348
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.3% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst