Topic summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Industrial Innovation results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 1,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,086 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,105 of 16,562 topics). This Industrial Innovation is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Industrial Innovation
Topic details
Total words: 1,086
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.3% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 27.6%27.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 18.0%18.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.3%12.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Middle Ground: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos