Topic summary
ā 27% 1 analyzed article/video 600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Industrial History results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 163 hits . Analysis detected 1,422 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ā 49% (10,895 of 21,107 topics). This Industrial History is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group. Industrial History
Topic details
Total words: 2,400
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst