Author summary
26% 2 analyzed articles/videos 600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kat Sachs results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 163 hits . Analysis detected 1,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,618 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 32% (5,742 of 8,359 authors). This Kat Sachs is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Kat Sachs
Author details
Total words: 3,618
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst