Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos314 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indo Pacific results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 54.5% saturation with 685 hits. Analysis detected 2,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,256 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,588 of 16,562 topics). This Indo Pacific is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group.
Indo Pacific
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,256
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510090.4% percentile
8.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 54.5%54.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 25.6%25.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.5%25.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.3%8.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.7%11.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.8%24.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 54.5%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 25.6%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 11.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Composition/Division: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos