Topic summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indigenous Health results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 639 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,326 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,443 of 16,562 topics). This Indigenous Health is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Indigenous Health
Topic details
Total words: 1,326
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.1% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.7%13.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos