Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indigenous Governance results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 318 faulty-reasoning hits from 496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,319 of 16,562 topics). This Indigenous Governance is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Indigenous Governance
Topic details
Total words: 496
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510086.0% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles496 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.7%14.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.3%10.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos