Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indictments results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 1,195 hits. Analysis detected 9,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,985 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (5,961 of 16,562 topics). This Indictments is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Indictments
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.0% percentile
3.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.0%20.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.7%11.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.1%14.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos