Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video308 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indianapolis Colts results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 379 hits. Analysis detected 2,163 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,183 of 15,437 topics). This Indianapolis Colts is worse (more manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group.
Indianapolis Colts
Topic details
Total words: 1,232
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510085.9% percentile
7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 30.8%30.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 24.9%24.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.6%16.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.3%16.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.8%8.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos