Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indiana Hoosiers results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anchoring Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 507 hits . Analysis detected 2,767 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,515 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,755 of 16,562 topics). This Indiana Hoosiers is worse (more manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group. Indiana Hoosiers
Topic details
Total words: 1,515
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.4% percentile 8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 33.5% 33.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 19.0% 19.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Topic 33.5%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst