Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,334 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indian Ocean results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 672 hits . Analysis detected 5,183 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 58% (7,072 of 16,562 topics). This Indian Ocean is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group. Indian Ocean
Topic details
Total words: 5,336
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.3% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst