Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video4,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These India Pakistan Tensions results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,090 hits. Analysis detected 9,332 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,242 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (13,988 of 15,755 topics). This India Pakistan Tensions is better (less manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group.
India Pakistan Tensions
Topic details
Total words: 13,242
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510011.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos