Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 4,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These India Pakistan Tensions results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,090 hits . Analysis detected 9,332 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,242 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (13,988 of 15,755 topics). This India Pakistan Tensions is better (less manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group. India Pakistan Tensions
Topic details
Total words: 13,242
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst