Topic summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video1,071 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Independent Contractors results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 647 hits. Analysis detected 4,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,213 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,005 of 15,448 topics). This Independent Contractors is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Independent Contractors
Topic details
Total words: 3,213
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.1% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.1%20.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.5%14.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos