Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inclusive Playground results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 300 hits. Analysis detected 2,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,350 of 16,562 topics). This Inclusive Playground is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Inclusive Playground
Topic details
Total words: 2,732
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.2%10.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos