Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These In Flight Medical Emergencies results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 715 hits. Analysis detected 6,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,275 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This In Flight Medical Emergencies is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
In Flight Medical Emergencies
Topic details
Total words: 10,275
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos