Topic summary
⁠70%2 analyzed articles/videos714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Impersonation results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 429 hits. Analysis detected 2,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,142 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,228 of 16,562 topics). This Impersonation is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Impersonation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,142
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.4% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 20.0%20.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Red Herring: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos