Topic summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video1,177 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Impacto En Neoyorquinos De Bajos Ingresos results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 2,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,531 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,101 of 16,562 topics). This Impacto En Neoyorquinos De Bajos Ingresos is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Impacto En Neoyorquinos De Bajos Ingresos
Topic details
Total words: 3,531
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.1% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos