Topic summary
⁠10%1 analyzed article/video1,667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Impact Of Technology On Creativity results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 310 hits. Analysis detected 2,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,001 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,864 of 16,562 topics). This Impact Of Technology On Creativity is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Impact Of Technology On Creativity
Topic details
Total words: 5,001
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos