Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Impact Of Neoliberalism On Social Movements results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 1,349 hits. Analysis detected 3,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,430 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Impact Of Neoliberalism On Social Movements is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Impact Of Neoliberalism On Social Movements
Topic details
Total words: 5,430
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 24.8%24.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Horn Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos