Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ahmad Al-Sholi results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Indoctrination , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 1,349 hits . Analysis detected 3,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,430 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Ahmad Al-Sholi is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ahmad Al-Sholi
Author details
Total words: 5,430
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 24.8% 24.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.8% 4.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 24.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst