Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video622 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Impact Of Major Events On Local Economies results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 502 hits. Analysis detected 3,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (4,841 of 15,414 topics). This Impact Of Major Events On Local Economies is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group.
Impact Of Major Events On Local Economies
Topic details
Total words: 2,488
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.6% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 19.3%19.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.2%20.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.3%5.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Composition/Division: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos