Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immortals Lion Dance results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 622 hits. Analysis detected 4,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,385 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,631 of 15,769 topics). This Immortals Lion Dance is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Immortals Lion Dance
Topic details
Total words: 3,385
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.0% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Horn Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos