Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigration Enforcement Funding results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 1,009 hits . Analysis detected 6,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (7,980 of 16,562 topics). This Immigration Enforcement Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group. Immigration Enforcement Funding
Topic details
Total words: 5,784
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.4% 17.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst