Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigration Enforcement Funding results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 1,009 hits. Analysis detected 6,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (7,980 of 16,562 topics). This Immigration Enforcement Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Immigration Enforcement Funding
Topic details
Total words: 5,784
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.8% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.4%17.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos