Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigrant Advocacy results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Begging the Question, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 2,168 hits. Analysis detected 9,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,548 of 15,766 topics). This Immigrant Advocacy is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Immigrant Advocacy
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠53%Immigrant Advocacy (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 10,524
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.1% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Politically Left Leaning 
Sitewide 2.0%Topic 17.4%17.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.6%20.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos