Topic summary
32% 2 analyzed articles/videos 491 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immersive Experiences results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 478 hits . Analysis detected 4,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,361 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,736 of 16,412 topics). This Immersive Experiences is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group. Immersive Experiences
Topic details
Total words: 4,361
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst