Topic summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 1,285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illicit Market results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 503 hits . Analysis detected 2,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,855 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 52% (8,082 of 16,559 topics). This Illicit Market is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group. Illicit Market
Topic details
Total words: 3,855
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Special Pleading: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst