Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos857 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illegal Immigrants results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 589 hits. Analysis detected 4,974 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,428 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (5,713 of 15,142 topics). This Illegal Immigrants is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Illegal Immigrants
Topic details
Total words: 3,428
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.3% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.2%16.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.8%11.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.8%12.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos