Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video861 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Idolatry results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, False Dilemma, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 868 hits. Analysis detected 4,957 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,253 of 16,562 topics). This Idolatry is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Idolatry
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,444
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.3% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.2%25.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 19.7%19.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.7%8.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Composition/Division: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos