Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video828 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Idiocracy results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.8% saturation with 1,484 hits. Analysis detected 6,339 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,792 of 16,562 topics). This Idiocracy is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Idiocracy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 44.8%44.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 18.0%18.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 21.7%21.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 44.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos